|
|
Post by Bonobo on Feb 7, 2011 20:20:13 GMT 1
I just read that milk with 3.2% fat content (the highest available here) is healthier than low fat milk. Fat in milk is good as it carries vitamins A, D, E and K and calcium. What is more, it doesn`t contribute to obesity at all. Generally, high fat milk even protects our bodies against cancer. In Polish: www.fakt.pl/Pij-tylko-tluste-mleko,artykuly,95260,1.html Mike, hot women for you.   ![]() [/img] ![]() [/img] |
|
|
|
Post by jeanne on Feb 7, 2011 20:27:58 GMT 1
I just read that milk with 3.2% fat content (the highest available here) is healthier than low fat milk. Fat in milk is good as it carries vitamins A, D, E and K and calcium. What is more, it doesn`t contribute to obesity at all. Generally, high fat milk even protects our bodies against cancer. This is exactly what my daughter, the natural food advocate, says about milk, and in particular raw, organic milk. She claims that homogenization and pasteurization of the whole-fat milk diminishes the benefits of the fat in the milk and may also make that processed fat detrimental to our bodies. That's the only kind of milk she and my son-in-law drink. My grandson also drinks it. |
|
uncltim
Just born
I oppose most nonsense.
Posts: 73
|
Post by uncltim on Feb 8, 2011 3:26:16 GMT 1
Think of it this way, If I process milk, I want to sell more of the more valuable (profitable) part of the milk, which is the fat. Milkfat is used in the production of ice cream, cheese, yogurt, butter, etc. If I can produce less milk and make a better living by convincing people to accept an jnferior product while maintaining current pricing, all the better. (Milk producers don't do this, processers do.) What better way to get people to accept less valuable milk than by telling them that milkfat is bad for them! But see, I've stepped in and solved this error of nature by removing it for you.  (slick ad campaigns) This also hurts milk producers (farmers) because products that used to take 50 gallons of milk to produce now only takes 35. I personally buy whole milk just because reduced fat milk tastes like whey to me. |
|
|
|
Post by Bonobo on Feb 9, 2011 9:55:45 GMT 1
Think of it this way, If I process milk, I want to sell more of the more valuable (profitable) part of the milk, which is the fat. Milkfat is used in the production of ice cream, cheese, yogurt, butter, etc. If I can produce less milk and make a better living by convincing people to accept an jnferior product while maintaining current pricing, all the better. (Milk producers don't do this, processers do.) What better way to get people to accept less valuable milk than by telling them that milkfat is bad for them! But see, I've stepped in and solved this error of nature by removing it for you. (slick ad campaigns) This also hurts milk producers (farmers) because products that used to take 50 gallons of milk to produce now only takes 35. I personally buy whole milk just because reduced fat milk tastes like whey to me. I just read that milk with 3.2% fat content (the highest available here) is healthier than low fat milk. Fat in milk is good as it carries vitamins A, D, E and K and calcium. What is more, it doesn`t contribute to obesity at all. Generally, high fat milk even protects our bodies against cancer. This is exactly what my daughter, the natural food advocate, says about milk, and in particular raw, organic milk. She claims that homogenization and pasteurization of the whole-fat milk diminishes the benefits of the fat in the milk and may also make that processed fat detrimental to our bodies. That's the only kind of milk she and my son-in-law drink. My grandson also drinks it. You are right, I think. What about the next one?
BEWARE: Your Fireplace or Wood Burning Stove May Be Harming Your Health in an Unexpected Way
by www.SixWise.com
As the holidays near and the air becomes more frigid, families gather around fireplaces and wood-burning stoves seeking warm comfort. Unfortunately for many --- especially those who suffer from asthma and allergies -- the use of such heating devices can trigger health-related disasters in unexpected ways.
Dr. Leonard Bielory, director of the Asthma and Allergy Research Center at the UMDNJ-New Jersey Medical School in Newark, says emergency room visits from asthma attacks quadruple following the fall's first frost. "There are particles and toxic agents emitted by burning wood that, when inhaled, may cause shortness of breath or wheezing and possibly a life-threatening asthma attack that may require emergency health care."
The wood smoke from fireplaces and wood-burning stoves contain fine particles that can pose a health threat to you and your family.
Wood Smoke Break Down
Wood smoke from fireplaces and wood-burning stoves contain fine particles and gases that can pose a serious health threat to you and your family. The smoke emitted from wood burning contains the following:
*
Fine Particles: These particles are so small that several thousand of them could fit on the period at the end of a sentence. They reach the deepest recesses of the lungs and accelerate hardening of the arteries, negatively affecting heart function.
*
Nitrogen Dioxide: This odorless gas that can irritate your eyes, nose and throat and cause shortness of breath. In people with asthma, exposure to low levels of NO2 may cause increased bronchial reactivity and make young children more susceptible to respiratory infections. Long-term exposure to high levels of NO2 can lead to chronic bronchitis.
*
Carbon Monoxide: This odorless, colorless, poisonous gas interferes with the delivery of oxygen throughout the body and may cause headaches, dizziness and, at higher concentrations, death. Those with cardiac and respiratory disease may be more sensitive to lower levels of this gas.
*
Toxic Compounds: These include such compounds as formaldehyde, benzene, methyl chloride and methyl ethyl ketone (a wide range of compounds that usually have no color, taste or smell.) Some cause direct and negative health effects by penetrating deep into the lungs.
*
Carbon Dioxide: This greenhouse gas contributes to global climate change.
The above particles found in wood smoke are too small to be filtered by the nose and upper respiratory system, so they end up deep in your lungs. They can remain there for several months causing structural damage and chemical changes to your body without you even being aware. ........................ The rest of the long article is here: www.sixwise.com/newsletters/05/11/30/beware-your-fireplace-or-wood-burning-stove-may-be-harming-your-health-in-an-unexpected-way.htm |
|
|
|
Post by valpomike on Feb 10, 2011 19:51:14 GMT 1
Thank you Al Gore!
Mike
|
|
|
|
Post by Bonobo on Feb 11, 2011 13:20:17 GMT 1
I guess you intend to say that global warming is a humbug? ;D ;D ;D ;D How about this one?:
Beware the virtual mark of the Beast?
11.02.2011 12:25
Websites containing content on the occult may expose internet surfers to devilish influences, even succumbing to satanic possession, warn Polish exorcists.
The ultra-conservative Catholic Nasz Dziennik daily writes that many internet sites dabble in the occult, as well as magic, tarot readings as well as the setting and lifting of curses in exchange for money.
According to exorcists quoted by the daily, such websites have an increasing influence on younger viewers, who may find themselves becoming possessed by Satan himself.
While the internet may be used as bountiful resource of knowledge, not everything found on the web is worthy of attention, the daily warns.www.thenews.pl/national/artykul149144_beware-the-virtual-mark-of-the-beast.html |
|
|
|
Post by valpomike on Feb 11, 2011 18:09:06 GMT 1
Al Gore and his people are full of bunk. We can't change things, even it we wanted to. Changes come around on there own. This is history.
Mike
|
|
(slick ad campaigns) This also hurts milk producers (farmers) because products that used to take 50 gallons of milk to produce now only takes 35. 